[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cgs-wg] Feedback on the CGS Job Model
thanks for reviewing and offering the suggstions - they are certainly well
taken and meaningful.
We should discuss on the call today - and I'll then update the visio and
"Andrea Westerinen" <email@example.com>
Sent by: firstname.lastname@example.org
02/18/2003 03:26 AM
To: "'Larry Flon'" <flon@ISI.EDU>, <email@example.com>
Subject: [cgs-wg] Feedback on the CGS Job Model
Here is my feedback and recommended changes on the Job Model:
1. Recommended changes are listed in Blue in the attached PDF. I worked
off the last UML (that I have) from Ellen.
2. Some MOF cleanup is needed - for example, the DMTF convention for
enumerations is that Unknown=0, Other=1. Also, you may want to allow
for ranges of Vendor-specific values in the enums. Other examples where
changes are needed are references to deprecated properties - such as
MSE's Status property. These should be updated.
If acceptable, I can regenerate the VISIO and clean things up a bit, and
generate the MOF. I can send a copy of both this evening - and then use
these in the demo.
#### batch job - 17 feb 2003.pdf has been removed from this note on
February 18, 2003 by Ellen Stokes