Re: [cgs-wg] Feedback on the CGS Job Model

[Ellen Stokes <stokese@us.ibm.com>]

Andrea,
thanks for reviewing and offering the suggstions - they are certainly well 
taken and meaningful.
We should discuss on the call today - and I'll then update the visio and 
mof.
Ellen






"Andrea Westerinen" <andreaw@cisco.com>
Sent by: owner-cgs-wg@gridforum.org
02/18/2003 03:26 AM

 
        To:     "'Larry Flon'" <flon@ISI.EDU>, <cgs-wg@gridforum.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        [cgs-wg] Feedback on the CGS Job Model 



Here is my feedback and recommended changes on the Job Model:

1. Recommended changes are listed in Blue in the attached PDF.  I worked
off the last UML (that I have) from Ellen.

2. Some MOF cleanup is needed - for example, the DMTF convention for
enumerations is that Unknown=0, Other=1.  Also, you may want to allow
for ranges of Vendor-specific values in the enums.  Other examples where
changes are needed are references to deprecated properties - such as
MSE's Status property.  These should be updated.

If acceptable, I can regenerate the VISIO and clean things up a bit, and
generate the MOF.  I can send a copy of both this evening - and then use
these in the demo.

Andrea




#### batch job - 17 feb 2003.pdf has been removed from this note on 
February 18, 2003 by Ellen Stokes