[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [sem-grd] Agents and the Grid?
- To: David De Roure <dder@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: [sem-grd] Agents and the Grid?
- From: Carole Goble <carole@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 15:47:08 +0000
- Cc: Semantic Grid Research Group <sem-grd@gridforum.org>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10410300041540.16598-100000@pandora>
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10410300041540.16598-100000@pandora>
- Sender: owner-sem-grd@gridforum.org
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
Dave
In my recent ECAI keynote on the Semantic Grid I had a section on
Agents. This was coming from the point if view that the agent community
and the knowledge rep. community were often the same.
If you have another activity with agents and the grid separate to the
Semantic Grid RG, isn't that just dividing your already small base? I
would welcome more active help and effort in FEWER RG andWG, not yet
more. I would like to see the agents people involved in the SEM-GRD,
scheduling, OGSA etc activities rather than in a ghetto.
Carole
Some GGF business.
There will be a discussion about GGF area reorganisation at a
forthcoming GGF Steering Group meeting (at SC2004).
In fact this doesn't affect the Semantic Grid Research Group much.
We're currently in the architecture area, we could well have been
in data, and it doesn't make a huge amount of difference anyway(!)
Meanwhile I have been advocating the introduction of an activity
in the area of agents and the grid, and this has attracted some
interest from parts of the agents community where there are some
existing grid activities. It needs a champion and I think this
may happen.
So, through reorganisation of the areas, this may will end up in
an area alongside Semantic Grid (which may be a good thing when it
comes to bridge-building).
Anyway, I'd welcome any comments from the community on this (e.g.
do you think GGF should have an agents and the grid activity? Do
you think it should sit next to Semantic Grid?), so that I can go
into the discussions able to represent your views.
Thanks
-- Dave